Futurist John Petersen: The future of knowledge lies in DECENTRALIZATION through AI and open-source innovation

• Mike Adams has introduced Enoch, an AI-powered, open-source language model set to be released in March. Named after a biblical figure known for his knowledge and wisdom, Enoch aims to challenge information monopolies and provide access to unconventional topics.
• Adams highlights the limitations of traditional search engines like Google, portraying them as barriers to genuine discovery. Enoch aims to democratize access to alternative information, such as alternative medicine and non-mainstream perspectives, empowering individuals to make informed decisions.
• Adams and futurist John Petersen discuss the future of AI, emphasizing its potential to enhance human capabilities rather than replace human decision-making. They view AI as a tool for synthesizing new knowledge and fostering a new kind of human with expanded capabilities.
• The conversation concludes with a call for practical actions to ensure the decentralization of knowledge. This includes creating alternative media platforms, leveraging AI to promote critical thinking, and building collaborative communities that facilitate a transition towards a more equitable world. Both express cautious optimism about Enoch’s potential to allow individuals to take control of their knowledge and lives.

In a world where knowledge and information are increasingly becoming tools of control, the Enoch AI language learning model (LLM) offers a beacon of hope for a decentralized future.

During a recent “Health Ranger Report” interview, Mike Adams introduced a groundbreaking initiative aimed at challenging the current monopolies on information. This initiative, known as Enoch, is a proposed artificial intelligence (AI)-powered language model set to be released open-source and freely available starting on March 1.

Named after the biblical figure Enoch, the model will utilize an extensive library of unconventional knowledge encompassing topics such as alternative medicine and UFOs (unidentified flying objects), which have been largely ignored or dismissed by mainstream academia and media.

John Petersen, a leading voice in unconventional phenomena, emphasized the urgency of decentralizing knowledge in the face of growing attempts by centralized entities to control information and, by extension, the population. The award-winning writer warned that the forces behind this centralization, driven by corporate and governmental interests, are pushing for a dystopian, technocratic control over society.

“It’s all about increasing kind of control,” Petersen said. “And the other alternative is this kind of an emergence of a kind of a new human that accesses the intrinsic kind of capabilities and powers and capabilities that are embedded in us that we came with, but have been constrained by the whole system.”

“So we’re in a process here, or a place, where we effectively have to untether ourselves from all of the things that are holding us down which allow us to go off into a new direction and build literally a new world.”

Decentralizing knowledge is crucial for humanity’s survival

Adams agreed that the decentralization of knowledge is crucial for humanity’s survival, pointing out the limitations of traditional search engines like Google, which he describes as a “blockade of information” rather than a platform for genuine discovery. The free speech platforms architect argued that by providing access to a diverse array of information, from alternative medicine to alternative perspectives on climate change, Enoch could empower individuals to make more informed decisions and question the status quo.

The conversation also delved into the future of AI, with both experts acknowledging the potential of AI to either enhance human capabilities or replace human decision-making. (Related: Joshua Hale on Decentralize TV: The importance of decentralized AI SYSTEMS.)

Petersen emphasized the importance of leveraging AI to augment human abilities, arguing that the technology could be used to foster a new kind of human, one that can access previously dormant latent capabilities. Adams suggested that the AI’s ability to process and generate synthetic data could help in the synthesis of new knowledge, further democratizing access to information.

In addition to discussing the immediate applications of Enoch, both experts explored broader implications of a future where information is freely accessible and open to interpretation. This includes the potential for a broader understanding of mankind’s place in the universe, with Petersen highlighting the significance of UFO disclosure and other unconventional phenomena that challenge mainstream scientific paradigms.

The conversation concluded with a focus on the practical steps needed to ensure the decentralization of knowledge becomes a reality. Petersen and Adams discussed the importance of creating alternative media platforms and leveraging AI to promote critical thinking and informed decision-making.

They emphasized the role of communities and collaborative platforms like the Arlington Institute’s TransitionNet in fostering a transition towards a more equitable and decentralized world.

As the interview drew to a close, both expressed cautious optimism about the potential of this initiative to allow individuals to take control over their own knowledge and, by extension, their lives. They urged listeners to prepare for a period of rapid change, emphasizing the importance of expanding one’s understanding and remaining open to new perspectives.

Follow FutureTech.news for more stories about AI.

Watch the full interview between futurist John Petersen of the Arlington Institute and the Health Ranger Mike Adams below.

This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Congress report highlights how the federal government is weaponizing the development of AI for CENSORSHIP.

Ex-Google CEO warns that AI poses an imminent existential threat.

AI takeover is INEVITABLE: Experts warn artificial intelligence will become powerful enough to control human minds, behaviors.

Sources include:

Brighteon.com

ArlingtonInstitute.org 1

ArlingtonInstitute.org 2